Showing posts with label Blog Mirror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blog Mirror. Show all posts
Friday, March 14, 2025
Saturday, February 22, 2025
Lex Anteinternet: What's Wrong with the United States? We're really ignorant, and its getting worse.
Lex Anteinternet: What's Wrong with the United States? We're really...:
21% of adults in the US are illiterate. 54% of American adults have a literacy below a 6th-grade level.
What's Wrong with the United States? We're really ignorant, and its getting worse.
21% of adults in the US are illiterate. 54% of American adults have a literacy below a 6th-grade level.
And we wonder how Trump got elected?
The illiterate are ignorant, and blisteringly ignorant people vote for stupid stuff.
I had a very strange experience the other day, which I need to be indistinct about.
It had to do with homeschooling.
Twice in recent weeks I've run across a topic that's in the legislature, that being the legal requirement, which the Wyoming 2025 Legislative assembly is about to wipe out, that home schooling parents submit their educational plans to their local school districts. The requirement is there to prevent parents from basically not educating their children.
Not educating children is what homeschooling is all about.
This wasn't always the case, but it's become the case.
Some background.
My father was the first male in his family to graduate from high school. He might have been the third member of the family, as I don't know that much about my paternal grandmother's early life in that fashion. She probably graduated high school in Denver however, likely from a Catholic high school. His older sister graduated from a high school in Scottsbluff.
My father went on to a doctorate.
My paternal grandfather, who left school to work at age 13, had such an advance knowledge of mathematics that he helped his children with their high school calculus homework, which is revealing for two reasons, one that is amazing on his part, and secondly all of my father's siblings took calculus in high school.
I didn't take calculus in high school
My father could speak two languages, English and German, and had a knowledge of Latin. My paternal grandfather also could speak two languages, English and German, and had a knowledge of Latin.
My mother did not graduate from high school She was not given the opportunity to. She earned an Associates as a an adult. Her mother was university educated, as was her father. They all spoke two languages, English and French, and had a command of Latin.
Growing up in my family household was like getting a post doctorate in some things, history and science in particular. I read so early that I was on to adult books before I left grade school and had the odd experience of a junior high librarian not wishing to check a history book as she feared it was too advance. I read The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire before I left junior high.
I was in fact educated on a lot of stuff at home. . . but I was sent to school.
There's an interesting pattern here. Some of my friends of my age had college educated parents, but not all of them did. But all of my friends attended college or university. Not all graduated, but they did receive some post high school education. One of my closest friends had a father who did not graduate from high school. He joined the Army in his senior year to fight in World War Two, following in the footsteps of a father who had fought in World War One. My friend has two bachelors degrees.
And there's another thing here. Even those people I knew from my generation, and the prior one, who had parents that didn't graduate high school, had quite literate parents. If I ever went into a house that didn't have a lot of books somewhere, it was shocking. I can only really recall one. The home of my friend noted above was like a library. My parents house and that of all of my aunts and uncles were packed with books. In my parents house you could find a few books that were in German or French. A friend of mine who did not graduate from high school, but none the less went off to university, recalled his grandparents house being packed with books in . . . Gaelic.
My paternal grandmother absolutely insisted that my father go on to get an advanced degree, something he briefly though about not doing. His unmarried sister near in age to him was sent to university as well. I was given no real choice but to go on to higher education myself.
And this was common for people my generation, and the preceding one. Farm and ranch family in particular often had a manic dedication to higher education.
Home schooling has been around since time immemorial, I suppose, but when I was a kid, what it probably meant, where I live, is that the kid in question was living on a really remote ranch. Even then, most ranching parents made a dedicated effort to avoid that. More than a few had a teacher who lived at the ranch, paid for by the school district. The county I live in had four rural remote public schools, of which only one is still in operation. The neighboring one had some so remote that if you run across them on really rural roads its a shock. The teachers at these institutions were admired in a way that's hard to describe. Anything going on in the area always included them.
I didn't know a single homeschooled kid growing up.
Next to home schooling, of course, is private schooling. When I was young the only private school I ever heard of was the Catholic school. It was a big downtown school. It's moved from downtown, but it still exists. Catholic education had long been a thing in the US and apparently Catholics are supposed to send their kids to Catholic schools if they can, but I didn't go to it (it was full), nor did our kids.
When in high school I learned that there was a Lutheran grade school, to my enormous surprise, as I walked by it every day. After high school I learned that there was a "Christian" school, by which I mean a school attached to one of the sort of due it yourself evangelical Protestant groups. It started in 1978, so I would have been in high school when it commenced operating. The ministers for that church, at the time, were drawn from the congregation, and I later met one who was ironically adverse with its tenants as he was a geologist who accepted the truth of evolution, which the church did not.
A church that thinks evolution is a fib, probably doesn't have it taught in its schools.
Which is the point, really. The goal of a large amount of modern homeschooling is to keep students as ignorant as possible, which is conceived of as limiting tehir "exposure" to corrupting elements.
I've been exposed to a few homeschooled kids over the years and frankly a lot of them were rather weird and very socially awkward. Having said that, I've met one kid, and know of another, from a homeschooling family who were not that way, and one of which went on to a really high dollar career.
Now, with that comment, let me note that education isn't about getting rich, or shouldn't be. It's about the Allegory of the Cave. The problem here is that those exposed to the sunlight are seeking to drag the ir offspring back into it, deeper in the cave, and into chains.
The simple fact of the matter is that Americans were much more literate prior to the 1990s than they are now. They read. They read even if they hadn't graduated high school.
And they read a lot, and a lot of it is much more advanced than what people claim to read now. Even people who mostly read novels often read things much more advanced than people do now. I recall one parent of a family friend being a fanatic fan of C. S. Forester, whose novels were just that, but noen the less dealt often with the Napoleonic Wars, something a lot of current Americans probably don't know occured. One fellow I knew in the National Guard loved Louis Lamour, so much so that he read The Walking Drum, which is set in the Middle Ages, about which he was able to speak intelligently. Another fellow, who had been a career Marine, was reading War and Peace.
Everyone read the newspaper. You'd frequently see periodicals in people's houses, including unfortunately Playboy on occasion, but the latter had sufficiently good interviews that my high school newspaper teacher used those as examples and adopted them for the pattern of a series in that high school journal. Less unfortunately, you'd see Time, Newsweek and Life in people's houses routinely. And everyone read the local newspaper, by which I mean everyone.
The National Geographic seemed to be in the home of every household that had children, including ours. Our collection went back into the 1940s, from my father's parents home.
Cartoons didn't make much of an appearance in our house, and I"ve never developed a taste for most of the cartoon journal type of cartoons, like Superman, but what I do recall is when they showed up, it was often Mad Magazine, which actually is really adult oriented, and not in the juvenile way "adult" is often used.
The point is, when people claim people were "more educated" in the past, including populists who are not today, they tended to be, but in ways that people now just don't really quite grasp. They often had lower levels of educational achievement, but because they lived in a literate world, they were societally educated.
You can go into a lot of homes today and find that the occupants read. . . nothing.
Instead, people consume only what suits them.
In almost all of the 20th Century, it wasn't really possible to hear only the news you wanted to. Even if you limited yourself to radio, prior to the introduction of television, you were going to get a wide range of news. Newspapers were, as noted, almost a requirement for most households. When television came in, at first, it was highly local but the news was national and there was no avoiding it. You weren't going to get right or left wing propaganda from anyone.
That's all passed.
Americans aren't reading. What media they consume is self reaffirming, like Protestant sermons from the 1600s. People are listening only to like minds, and the nation is becoming more and more ignorant.
Which is why we have Donald Trump in office. No literate nation would elect him to anything.\
Note that this doesn't mean the population is dumb. Ignorant and dumb are not the same thing. But we suffer from the Jo Jo Rabbit Effect in a major way. We're listening, basically, to ourselves, and making excuses for our failures, and justifying our appetites.
And it puts the entire globe in danger.
Tuesday, February 11, 2025
Lex Anteinternet: Blog Mirror: LETTER OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS TO THE BISHOPS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lex Anteinternet: Blog Mirror: LETTER OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ...:
Blog Mirror: LETTER OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS TO THE BISHOPS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LETTER OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS
TO THE BISHOPS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
_________________
Dear Brothers in the Episcopate,
I am writing today to address a few words to you in these delicate moments that you are living as Pastors of the People of God who walk together in the United States of America.
1. The journey from slavery to freedom that the People of Israel traveled, as narrated in the Book of Exodus, invites us to look at the reality of our time, so clearly marked by the phenomenon of migration, as a decisive moment in history to reaffirm not only our faith in a God who is always close, incarnate, migrant and refugee, but also the infinite and transcendent dignity of every human person. [1]
2. These words with which I begin are not an artificial construct. Even a cursory examination of the Church’s social doctrine emphatically shows that Jesus Christ is the true Emmanuel (cf. Mt 1:23); he did not live apart from the difficult experience of being expelled from his own land because of an imminent risk to his life, and from the experience of having to take refuge in a society and a culture foreign to his own. The Son of God, in becoming man, also chose to live the drama of immigration. I like to recall, among other things, the words with which Pope Pius XII began his Apostolic Constitution on the Care of Migrants, which is considered the “Magna Carta” of the Church’s thinking on migration:
“The family of Nazareth in exile, Jesus, Mary and Joseph, emigrants in Egypt and refugees there to escape the wrath of an ungodly king, are the model, the example and the consolation of emigrants and pilgrims of every age and country, of all refugees of every condition who, beset by persecution or necessity, are forced to leave their homeland, beloved family and dear friends for foreign lands.” [2]
3. Likewise, Jesus Christ, loving everyone with a universal love, educates us in the permanent recognition of the dignity of every human being, without exception. In fact, when we speak of “infinite and transcendent dignity,” we wish to emphasize that the most decisive value possessed by the human person surpasses and sustains every other juridical consideration that can be made to regulate life in society. Thus, all the Christian faithful and people of good will are called upon to consider the legitimacy of norms and public policies in the light of the dignity of the person and his or her fundamental rights, not vice versa.
4. I have followed closely the major crisis that is taking place in the United States with the initiation of a program of mass deportations. The rightly formed conscience cannot fail to make a critical judgment and express its disagreement with any measure that tacitly or explicitly identifies the illegal status of some migrants with criminality. At the same time, one must recognize the right of a nation to defend itself and keep communities safe from those who have committed violent or serious crimes while in the country or prior to arrival. That said, the act of deporting people who in many cases have left their own land for reasons of extreme poverty, insecurity, exploitation, persecution or serious deterioration of the environment, damages the dignity of many men and women, and of entire families, and places them in a state of particular vulnerability and defenselessness.
5. This is not a minor issue: an authentic rule of law is verified precisely in the dignified treatment that all people deserve, especially the poorest and most marginalized. The true common good is promoted when society and government, with creativity and strict respect for the rights of all — as I have affirmed on numerous occasions — welcomes, protects, promotes and integrates the most fragile, unprotected and vulnerable. This does not impede the development of a policy that regulates orderly and legal migration. However, this development cannot come about through the privilege of some and the sacrifice of others. What is built on the basis of force, and not on the truth about the equal dignity of every human being, begins badly and will end badly.
6. Christians know very well that it is only by affirming the infinite dignity of all that our own identity as persons and as communities reaches its maturity. Christian love is not a concentric expansion of interests that little by little extend to other persons and groups. In other words: the human person is not a mere individual, relatively expansive, with some philanthropic feelings! The human person is a subject with dignity who, through the constitutive relationship with all, especially with the poorest, can gradually mature in his identity and vocation. The true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the “Good Samaritan” (cf. Lk 10:25-37), that is, by meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception. [3]
7. But worrying about personal, community or national identity, apart from these considerations, easily introduces an ideological criterion that distorts social life and imposes the will of the strongest as the criterion of truth.
8. I recognize your valuable efforts, dear brother bishops of the United States, as you work closely with migrants and refugees, proclaiming Jesus Christ and promoting fundamental human rights. God will richly reward all that you do for the protection and defense of those who are considered less valuable, less important or less human!
9. I exhort all the faithful of the Catholic Church, and all men and women of good will, not to give in to narratives that discriminate against and cause unnecessary suffering to our migrant and refugee brothers and sisters. With charity and clarity we are all called to live in solidarity and fraternity, to build bridges that bring us ever closer together, to avoid walls of ignominy and to learn to give our lives as Jesus Christ gave his for the salvation of all.
10. Let us ask Our Lady of Guadalupe to protect individuals and families who live in fear or pain due to migration and/or deportation. May the “Virgen morena”, who knew how to reconcile peoples when they were at enmity, grant us all to meet again as brothers and sisters, within her embrace, and thus take a step forward in the construction of a society that is more fraternal, inclusive and respectful of the dignity of all.
Fraternally,
Francis
From the Vatican, 10 February 2025
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Lex Anteinternet: How did so many of us, become so mean?
Lex Anteinternet: How did so many of us, become so mean?:
How did so many of us, become so mean?
Indeed I tremble for my country when reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever: that considering numbers, nature and natural means only, a revolution of the wheel of fortune, an exchange of situation, is among possible events: that it may become probable by supernatural interference!
Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia
An item from Cowboy State Daily columnist Dave Simpson (who is not from Wyoming, like so many of Wyoming's far right are not):
Dave Simpson: Wyoming Paid Us To Cut Dead Trees
Within the column:
Apparently California hasn't had the good sense to encourage landowners to clear their land of the brush that went up in flames around Los Angeles last week, taking 24 lives and destroying 12,000 homes so far. One report explained that landowners clearing brush could be fined for killing rare, protected plants.
Good grief.
Here in Wyoming, we made our places less prone to fire.
Too bad California didn't encourage landowners to do the same.
They're paying the price now.
What a massively ignorant and mean thing to say.
The replies on twitter, at least, were not clueless:
Stephanie Hewitt@Stephhewitt1 2h
But even with thinning the forest, the Snowy Range would not survive with hurricane force winds during a forest fire. Stop the grandstanding.
Indeed the recent fire in Albany and Carbon Counties more than proved that.
Buckwild @veedawhoo 3h
Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back chief🙄
Exactly.
Traveler@JuniperMesa 1h
Fill Sky will massive amounts heat trapping gases, catastrophically overheat Planet = catastrophic climate change, Aridification, Megadrought, FireStorms gone Runaway, beyond Apocalyptic self reinforcing feedback loop, not "potential", Rocky Mountain Ecosystem, not built for heat
And right again.
Of course, as Simpson, who actual Wyomingites would not regard as a Wyomingite (you have to be born here or in a neighboring state, wondering in as an adult doesn't count), is from the far right, and as a far right migrant who didn't grow up here with winters were real, probably is in the climate change is a fib category.
It isn't.
The old saying is "paybacks are a bitch".
How naive and clueless can a person be to not realize that an urban fire.
There was a desert wind blowing that night. It was one of those hot dry Santa Anas that come down through the mountain passes and curl your hair and make your nerves jump and your skin itch. On nights like that every booze party ends in a fight. Meek little wives feel the edge of the carving knife and study their husbands' necks. Anything can happen. You can even get a full glass of beer at a cocktail lounge.
Raymond Chandler, Red Wind: A Collection of Short Stories
The fires were driven by Santa Ana winds, strong, extremely dry katabatic winds that originate inland and affect coastal Southern California and northern Baja California.
Chandler wasn't kidding. They're something else, and indeed "Meek little wives feel the edge of the carving knife and study their husbands' necks."
I fear that Wyoming is about to get a real dope slap.
California contributes five times more to the Federal coffers than it receives.
Then I rapped upon a house with a U.S. flag upon display
I said, "Could you help me out, I got some friends down the way"
The man said, "Get out of here, I'll tear you limb from limb"
I said, You know, they refused Jesus, too, " he said, "You're not him
Get out of here before I break your bones, I ain't your pop"
I decided to have him arrested, and I went looking for a cop
Bob Dylan 115th Street Dream.
Wyoming receives more than it gives.
Sitting there smug with a 307 beer can isn't going to change that.
And we have disasters, including fire related disasters, every year.
This year, the Hageman homestead was burned in one such fire.
Guess the Hageman's didn't know enough to clear the underbrush?
I suspect nobody is going to say that.
And if the fires return here next summer, and its been a very dry winter, what will people who hold such mean spirted views say?
And will Wyoming, which had its hand out for disaster relief in 2024, be too embarrassed to ask for it in 2024. Simpson speaks for a common view here, and the GOP is threatening to hold disaster aid to California up. Indeed, our Senator, in his new whip role, has hinted at that.
Nature and events have a terrible way of humbling the arrogant.
Every proud heart is an abomination to the LORD; be assured that none will go unpunished.
Proverbs, 16:5
Saturday, January 11, 2025
Lex Anteinternet: Saturday, January 11, 1975. Storms. Things can, and do, get worse.
Lex Anteinternet: Saturday, January 11, 1975. Storms. Things can, ...:
Saturday, January 11, 1975. Storms. Things can, and do, get worse.
The cover, page 3, and back cover, of Zhwandūn (ژوندون : مجله هفتگى), an Afghani magazine.
As I can't read the captions, I'm not entirely sure, but this appears to be Julie Christie, the actress.
Women's fashions appropriate for January in Afghanistan, but which would now get a person arrested given the Trump surrender to the Taliban.
Oh well, it's not us, right? And things can't get worse for us, right?
The Great Storm of 1975 was in full swing.
Surface weather analysis of the Great Storm on 11 January 1975.
Last edition:
Wednesday, January 8, 2025
Lex Anteinternet: Work with meaning and the meaning of work.
Lex Anteinternet: Work with meaning and the meaning of work.:
Work with meaning and the meaning of work.
You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig.
Blondie, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
I have a theory that certain work is existential by nature. My post on that from several months ago:
Why do I note this?
Well I've had a bunch of synchronicitous events happen recently that perhaps demand it being noted, assuming that anything must be noted here at all. Because they're all sort of circular, I'll start in one spot and gather the round corral, noting that these recollections are all recent, but not chronological.
I was walking out of the sporting goods store and ran into a law school colleague. For some reason or another, for much of my life, I've always been the youngest person in a group as a rule, even when I really shouldn't have been. Anyhow, this fellow, like two other of my law school friends, was an older law student, in law school, although I'm not sure how old he really was then, Two of my other friends, both Vietnam War era veterans, were in their 40s, so they're in their mid 70s now. I think this fellow was probably in his mid to late 30s. He remained remarkably the same looking all that time.
He kind of bounced around at first as a lawyer before landing in a firm where he practiced for maybe 20 years. He's retired now, and has been for awhile. He asked me if I was getting ready to retire, which I indicated I wasn't, but I did ask him about the process, and he gave me some details of how he'd gone about it.
Good to know from somebody who has done it.
He doesn't miss practicing at all.
In contrast to this, a close friend of mine, well really a relative, who is a lawyer who must be crowding 70 told me the other day he's not going to. He'd miss the collegiality of being a lawyer.
That answer shocked me. Not that he wasn't going to retire, but the collegiality.
Eh?
It may be just me, but only a handful of my friends are lawyers. I do have some lawyer friends. But most of my friends aren't lawyers and never have been. I wouldn't miss most lawyers whatsoever. Indeed, I miss a lot of my genuinely close friends due to the practice of law.
This, frankly, is probably an exception to the rule. Law is a unique profession, litigation with in the law even more so, and by and large the onliy people who have a grasp on what it is like are other lawyers. It is, I suppose, kind of like being a combat veteran that way. Lawyers hang out with other lawyers as they're lawyers.
Indeed, being heavily introverted, I've often noted how much lawyers enjoy professional gatherings. They really do. There are organizations that we're all part of and we'll go to a conference and there will be a big dinner or something, everyone goes.
Unless my spouse is with me, or one of the few lawyers I really know well and like, I tend to avoid those gatherings.
Anyhow this takes me to a second point.
I know a couple of lawyers who have lost their souls.
I don't mean in a metaphysical sense. That is, I'm not saying they're condemned to Hell. What I'm saying is that their personalities are gone and been absorbed by false ones in the pursuit of nothing more than money.
It happens to people. It's not a pleasant thing to see.
I was never friends with either of the ones I have in mind. Interestingly, however, one seems to be trying to emerge. One, who sank into this a long time ago actually started talking to me the other day about what he was going to do "next", something he's never said before.
A really good lawyer friend of mine is mostly retired. Like the fellow I mentioned above, while he had his doubts, he hasn't missed the practice at all.
Another good lawyer friend of mine, a woman, is trying to transition from one practice to another.
Two women I know otherwise recently lost their jobs. They weren't lawyers.
I note that as I think women in particular are subject to the Capitalist lie that careers are existentially defining, a completely modern notion.
St Paul was a tent maker. St. Peter a fisherman. I don't know if there are any classic Medieval or Renaissance paintings of St. Paul making a tent, but there should be.
Why do I note that?
Well, for this reason. You don't think much about St. Paul being a tent maker as his occupation didn't define him. His sainthood did.
But a lot of us moderns sure have made our occupations define us. And women are very much doing so now.
This takes me back to the item I linked in above.
That's more than I really need for my point here, but it ties in, this way.
Most careers are just jobs. They're an industrial way of separating you from your homes to make money for somebody else, in exchange for which you make some money too. This was done to men first, and then with the "women's liberation" movement of the 1960s, women drank the KookAide and have been wondering when the good feels will arrive.
They won't.
Most jobs have no greater existential meaning than that. If you define yourself by them, you are defining yourself as a fiction.
Which is why I worry about the lawyers who collapse into the cartoonish litigation personality. It makes you a cartoon, and not a very interesting one.
It's also why lawyers who become deep dive into the Whaling For Justice personality, or something like it, sort of boil off the people they were and become somebody nobody is interested in.
And I also think that's why old lawyers have a hard time retiring. After selling your life away, is this it? It must be. This must be it. I must love this as otherwise. . . .
I will note, and strongly, that I'm not advocating here for something that seems to be a current rage. Don't get any post high school education and hope for the best.
Indeed, the advocates of that, don't mean that. They mean don't forget to look at occupations where you work with your hands.
Now listen to me, all of you. You are all condemned men. We keep you alive to serve this ship. So row well, and live.
Quintus Arrius, Ben Hur.
The truth of the matter is that we sell our lives for a living, but we shouldn't sell our souls. A lot of career propaganda emphasis the nifty life you are supposed to have, but not the risk of losing your soul, and here I mean in both senses. Being able to sell the minutes of your life away for a decent return means that you need to have skills of some sort that are valuable. People should try to acquire those if for nothing else their own protection.
Women, I'd note, are particularly vulnerable here. A woman with a professional degree, such as law, is armed against loss of employer. A woman who doesn't have some sort of valuable skill is at the mercy of her employer. They're the ones who lose their jobs readily, and who are subject to all sorts of risks.
The trick, I guess, is to get those skills and remember that we shouldn't lose who we are.
One group of people who tend to make that career choice are people who work for the government. They're often grossly underpaid, but they also tend to have weighted the options and elected towards "quality of life". Lawyers who work for the AG's office, or biologists who work for state and Federal agencies provide such examples.
Interestingly, people on the outside in the same fields tend to hold these people in contempt. I guess people working 80 hours a week to make a go of it are naturally resentful towards those who do not. But those people are often very dedicated to their professions and even more purist than those who sell their labor in the private market. A dear cousin of mine who recently died was one such example. She was a research biologist at a university.
We're about to head into a Federal administration here that seems to contain a contempt to government employees. Indeed one recent campaign featured somebody who wants to limit the amount of time you can work for the Federal government. The same campaign repeatedly noted the candidates rural roots.
The rural roots are real, but what an irony. Descending from homesteaders means that you descent from the biggest American welfare program ever, one that used the U.S. Army to violently expel land occupants due to their race, to hand it out to European Americans. Don't mistake my point, I love agriculture and regard it as an existential occupation, and if I'd been alive when you could have homesteaded, I would have. But people who loved the land so much they fought for it, and lost, had the moral high ground on that, and those who came in behind them benefitted from the Federal largess and murder.
If you work for a living, why do you kill yourself working?
Tuco, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
Genesis tells us that since we sinned in the Garden, we've condemned ourselves to work. But it's also obvious that work was always part of the plan. It's interesting how well this comports to how evolution and societal development worked. We were likely a very happy group as aboriginals, and we know now that depression and modern angst is unknown in hunter gatherer societies. But we ate from the tree of knowledge and acquired it,
Well, now we have to work. Make the best of it.
Thursday, January 2, 2025
Lex Anteinternet: New Years Day. Looking at 2024 through the front of the Church doors.
Lex Anteinternet: New Years Day. Looking at 2024 through the front ...:
New Years Day. Looking at 2024 through the front of the Church doors.
I noted in our post New Year's Resolutions for Other People, sort of that we weren't going to post resolutions, but we did have some comments. That's true here as well.
New Years Day is the Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God, a Catholic holy day of obligation. Like a lot of Catholics, I went to Mass last night.
I didn't go last night as I intended to go whoop it up on the town.1 I've never been big on celebrating "New Years" anyhow, although we did last night with family and sort of extended family, as we have a at this point another person in the second half of their twenties whose pretty much incorporated into the family, but not officially or by blood. Anyhow, it was pretty low key and I was in bed before midnight. I think last year I made it to midnight to observe the fireworks some neighbors set off. This year I did not. I'm amazed that the same people, who really like fireworks, set them off again, as we've had hurricane force winds for the past day or so.
Anyhow, the reason I'm posting this comment is due to a particularly troublesome year for American Christianity in 2024.
American Protestants don't like to believe it, but the United States is and has always been a Protestant Country. It's so Protestant, that the Protestants can't recognize that, and even people who claim to have no religion at all are pretty Protestant. Even a lot of Catholics are pretty Protestantized and I've known some fairly secular Jews who were fairly Protestant.
Protestantism is a pretty big tent, with there being all sorts of tables within it, and with some of the tables really not liking others. For much of the country's history the Episcopal Church was the dominant Protestant Church, which made a lot of sense. The Episcopal Church is, of course, part of the Anglican Communion and the English descent is dominant in American ancestry. Supposedly this is 26% of the population now, but that figure is probably inaccurate by at least half simply because people whose ancestry stretches back away have simply forgotten it and is not celebrated the way other ancestral inheritance is. I'm of overwhelming Irish ancestry but even I have a little English ancestry of the Anglo Norman variety, brough in through Ireland.
Anyhow, as in the 18th Century most residents of British North America were from Great Britain, most were members of the Church of England, outside of Canada, where of course they were French and Catholic.
The Episcopal Church has never been in the only Protestant Church in what is now the US, however. Right from the beginning there were bodies of dissenters from the established church who came here to be able to practice their faith without being molested for it. That doesn't mean they were keen on others practicing their faiths, and they often didn't tolerate other Protestants at all. But they were there, and that gave rise to a sort of rough and ready loosely organized Protestantism in some regions, particularly the American South. These groups really prospered following the American Civil War as they hadn't gotten behind the war the way Southern Episcopalians had. These groups really spread across the nation following the 1970s. Looking back, its amazing to realize that growing up I knew exactly one Baptist kid (he's now a Lutheran) and the three big Protestant churches in this category didn't exist here. Wyoming is the least religious state in the US, but at that time almost all the Protestants I knew were Lutheran or Episcopalian. I knew a handful of Methodists and of course Mormons, but Baptists or Assemblies of God? Nope.
So what's this have to do with 2024?
The Election of 2024 saw a really strong association of Evangelical Christianity, which is very much an American thing, and the vote. It's distinctly different than anything that's occurred before.
Evangelical Christianity has been nationally significant in elections since at least 1950 or so, but it wasn't until 2024 that the "Christian vote" meant the Evangelical vote outside of the American South. Because they are fractured, they are not the largest Christian body in the country. Oddly enough, while 67% of the population self identifies as Christian, and something like 44% identify as Protestant, Catholics are the largest single denomination.
The back story to this however is that the Reformation, which started in 1517, is ending.
The Reformation was able to start in the first place due to a large element of ignorance. This can't be said of Luther, who wasn't ignorant, but who was opinionated and wrong. Luther opened the door, however, to people like Calvin, Zwingli and Knox who were fundamentally ignorant in certain ways.
The spread of cheap printing and ultimately the Internet makes ignorance on some things much more difficult to retain. For centuries bodies of Protestant Christians held to sola scriptura and a belief that they were like the first Christians, even though there's always been Christian texts dating back to shortly after Christ's crucifixion.2 Now, all of a sudden, anybody can read them. This has in fact caused a pronounced migration of really serious sola scriptura Christians to the Apostolic Churches, as well as a migration by serious "mainline" Protestants. Some bodies at this point, like very conservative Anglicans and Lutherans, are mostly Protestant out of pure obstinance.
The ultimate irony of all of this is that the mainline Protestant churches have collapsed in many places. Part of this is due to the massive increase in wealth in the western world which has hurt religion in general, but part is also because it gets to be tough to explain why you are a member of one of these churches if you can't explain a really solid reason to be, as opposed being in an Apostolic church.
At the same time, and not too surprisingly, similar forces have been operating in the Evangelical world in the US. As already noted, quite a few serious Evangelicals are now serious Catholics or Orthodox. Others, however, have retreated into a deep American Evangelicalism that is resistant to looking at the early Church, even though they are aware of it. This is rooted, in no small part, to the go it alone history of these bodies.
At the same time that this has occurred, the spread of the American Civil Religion has grown which sort of holds that everyone is going to Heaven as long as they aren't bad. Serious Catholics and Orthodox can't accommodate themselves to that but Evangelicals have attempted to, while at the same time realizing it really doesn't make sense.
Obergefell, as we noted, was the watershed moment. At that point, Christians of all types were faced with realizing that the US had really strayed far from observing its Christian origins, or at least the Christian faith, with there being all sorts of different reactions to it. In Catholic Churches there was the realization that we really hadn't become as American as we thought, and we weren't going to. Trads sprang up partially in reaction with now every Church having its contingent of Mantilla Girls giving an obstinate cultural no.
In Evangelical circles it helped fuel a militant conservatism that expresses its most radical nature in the New Apostolic Reformation which believes that we're on the cusp of a new Apostolic age, which will be Protestant in nature, and more transformational than any prior Great Awakening. They believe that the United States is charged with a Devine mission and some have concluded, as unlikely as it would seem from the outside, that Donald Trump is an improbable Cyrus the Great who will bring this about.
The support of Southern Episcopalians for the Southern cause in the Civil War damaged in the South to such an extent that the non mainline churches, like the Southern Baptist, came up as a major force after the war. The Baptists and Protestant itinerant preachers had warned during the war that wickedness was going to bring ruin. It seemed that their warnings were proven by the results of the war. Episcopal linking to a wicked cause diminished their credibility.
Donald Trump is not Cyrus the Great. Mike Johnson is not standing in the shoes of Moses. This will all have a bad end. Or it might. As noted, the Reformation is dying and in some ways this is the last stand of it. Those linking their Christianity to a man like Donald Trump are pinning their hopes, and their faith, on a weak reed. The question is what happens when it breaks and how much damage has been done, including to Christianity in general, in the meantime.
Moreover, the question also exists if you can claim to bear a Christian standard while not observing parts of the faith that are established but uncomfortable, let alone contrary to what is now so easy to determine not to be part of the early faith. Can those who clearly don't live a Christian life really be the shield wall against decay?
Footnotes:
1. As with my observation on Christmas in The Law and Christmas, being a Catholic puts you in a strange position in regard to the secular world, or rather the larger American culture. Lots of people start celebrating New Years pretty darned early on New Years Even, which means as an employer you start to get questions about whether we're closing at noon and the like, pretty early on. And also, while in the popular imagination people hit the bars at night, quite a few people have celebrator drinks here and there by late morning in reality. If your concern is getting to a vigil Mass soon after work, you aren't one of those people. And if you are one of the people hitting Mass in the morning, you aren't having a late night.
2. Sola scriptura never made sense and is obviously incorrect in that the New Testament itself mentions traditions outside of the written text. But the Bible, moreover, which is the scripture that "Bible Believing" Christian's look to is the version that was set out by the Catholic Church as the Canon of Scripture. Nowhere in the Bible does is there a Devine instruction as to what books would be included in the Bible.
Indeed, this position is further weakened in that Luther put some books he personally didn't like in an appendix, and later Protestants removed them. That wasn't Biblical. Moreover, the Eastern Orthodox Bible contains the Prayer of Manaseh, I Esdras, II Esdras, III Maccabees, IV Maccabees, Odes, and Psalm 151 and the Orthodox Tewahedo biblical canon some pre Christian Jewish books the others do not. While Catholics can explain why the books they include in their canon and can explain the relationship to the other Bibles, Protestant "Bible Believing" Christians flat out cannot. All of the texts in the Orthodox Bibles are genuine ancient texts without dispute. Moreover, there are early Christian writings which are genuine that are wholly omitted from any Bible. The Sola Scriptura position just accepts the King James version of the Bible on the basis that it must be the canon on a pure matter of faith, which is not relying on scripture alone.
Related thread:
Virgin Mary Mural in Salt Lake City
Lex Anteinternet: New Year's Resolutions for Other People, sort of.
Lex Anteinternet: New Year's Resolutions for Other People, sort of.: 
New Year's Resolutions for Other People, sort of.
Some years I post basically satiric resolutions for other people.
2024 was not a great year in a lot of ways, and 2025 promises not to be, thus making anything comedic seem rather inappropriate.
So this is a bit more serious.
The general election of 2024 was truly the worst one in the country's history. Two ancient men were offered up by the nation's two major political parties, with those parties only agreeing on the lie that you must vote for one of the two of them. The Democratic Party, which emerged for a while after World War Two as a center left party representing the working class, completed its post Vietnam War lurch to the far left and couldn't claw its way back from there. The Republican Party, formerly the party of conservatism and business, was destroyed by Donald Trump and his populist minions, a process set in motion in the 1970s and Reagan's Southern Strategy, thereby becoming a new expression of the Dixiecrats. The attack on education that began in the 1980s under Reagan seemed to bear weedy fruit as well, as middle class Americans, and some upper class Americans, grasped onto utter fictions offered up by Trump and company which promised to return the country to a fictional perfect past. Many voters, of course, felt trapped and voted both for and against politicians based on social issues which the Democrats in particular had helped bring into the forefront resulting in their defeat.
So, some serious hopes, if not resolutions.
Americans need to quit believing in something because it sounds like something they wish to be true.
We can't be an island insulated from the world. We've hoped to some degree to that since day one, but we've never been close to achieving that status. George Washington may have urged us to avoid foreign entanglements but we were involved, on an undeclared basis, in what were essentially two world wars by the early part of the 19th Century, one against France, and another against the United Kingdom and her allies. While many have long declared that "we aren't the world's policeman", if we aren't there's hardly any police at all. And if new police arise, there's a really good chance we won't like it. Our best hope, if we get to that point, is that its the combined countries of Europe, but what if, instead, its the People's Republic of China?
The internet and modern travel have shrunk the world so much that there's no escaping the impact of even minor disruptions around the globe. A war in Ukraine increases the cost of pasta in Italy and groceries, thereafter, in the US, as the most minor of examples.
We can whine about "forever wars" but the truth of the matter is that we haven't fought a substantial war since we backed out of Vietnam in 1973. Even at that, there were fewer men garrisoned in Vietnam at the height of the American involvement in the war than there were involved in the Battle of the Bulge, which of course was a single American World War Two battle. All wars are serious and horrible, but the post Vietnam War conflicts we've been in have, in real terms, been minor in comparison to anything that came after 1975's fall of Saigon.
We can't ignore the globe.
Climate Change is real and needs to be addressed basically 30 years ago. There is still time to act, but that action needs to be massive and drastic. Believing that this isn't the case is an example of willful denial of science and ultimately an act of theft, if not murder, of future generations. Denying this because my income is based on oil, and I freely concede much of mine is, doesn't change the reality.
Science of all types needs to be taken seriously. Sure, it isn't always right, but it's more often right than the ravings of somebody who bases their positions on the spouting of former Playboy centerfolds or quack celebrities.1
On this, vaccinations work. They do. If you don't want to get vaccinated, don't, but don't pretend that's because Bill Gates is looking for a way to steal your lunch.
On science, we need to comport more to nature. That includes our own natures. Poisoning the womb and murdering infants in the womb isn't "health care", its poisoning yourself and murdering your offspring. Its' deeply anti natural.
Along the same lines, there are only two genders in mammals. That's it. You, smart primate, are a member of the most sexually dimorphic species on the planet and are either deeply male or female. Those pretending otherwise as to their persons are mentally ill, either temporarily or perhaps more permanently. Society doesn't need to accommodate, in any fashion, this illness.
Homosexuality is the same, some sort of disorder, but not one that presents a societal threat through its tolerance. It does, however, due to excess accommodation. One of the world's oldest institutions, marriage, has been so damaged. But much damage had already been done to marriage due to the erosion of a serious understanding of what it is.
Of course, that was long in coming and gets to the next topic. Many societal institutions exist for the preservation and protection of society itself, not to make you "happy" or "fulfilled". Starting in 1953 we began the massive erosion of societal institutions and its been a complete disaster. There needs to be a serious effort to claw back that which has been lost, including in this area. There's no reason to tolerate extramarital procreation, whether its by some nameless drug addict or Elon Musk. Societal norms need to be restored.2
This gets necessarily to the topic of religion, which has been in the news constantly this year. It's odd if you realize that we can now so easily access early Christian texts that we can determine what early Christians believed very easily, and it often doesn't look anything like what's coming from The New Apostolic Reformation, or for that matter the "reformed" branches of the 16th Century Reformation, none of which has kept people from imagining Donald Trump as a latter day Cyrus the Great.
In 2024, when the writings of 124 AD are easily available, "religious" Americans who feel that Christianity stops at their own front door and that what they do is okay as they do it, are often far off the mark. Finding Donald Trump to be a "Godly man" with his serial polygamy and what not is absurd, but then people getting married again and again and pretending that comports with the faith also are out to lunch. It's not just Christianity, we'd note, that suffers from this.
Nature cares little if you accept nature and its doctrines. It simply gives the dope slap to those who don't. Not immediately, but sooner or later. The Populists who seized control of the country have a chance to recreate the county into what they imagine it should be, but only if they accept that. Chances are, of course, that National Conservatives will rapidly eclipse them in a year or two with Donald Trump's inevitable passing or inescapable dementia, and like it or nor, they appear to have a firmer grasp on this. People should ponder it and try to get a grasp themselves.
Part of that would be that if you feel a politician or a super rich dude has your interest in mind, or that if you believe that economics serves your own economic interest because it must, or if you feel that God abhors your homosexual neighbor but is okay with your third marriage, you need to rethink things.
Footnotes
1. Jenny McCarthy, who seems to have dropped off the public radar, was famous initially for being a brash Playboy centerfold was an early backer of the vaccines cause autism baloney. They do not. Now we see Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., backing that absurd view.
2. The other day I saw an item on Twitter in some dimwit on Twitter claiming some level of authority stated:
Taylor @taylor_vahey
waiting until marriage to have sex with someone is incredibly stupid due to the fact that sometimes two people are not sexually compatible
do not wait until you are locked in for life to find that out
That post is so moronic, on multiple levels, that it could lead to a long thread itself, but only a blistering rich and narcissistic society would even have a concept in some quarters of sexual compatibility.
Our species, homo sapiens sapiens, has gone from nearly being driven to extinction 900,000 years ago to dominating the globe. We know for a fact that homo sapiens sapiens mated with homo sapiens neaderthalensis, and we're we're learning that we, and the Neanderthals, mated with the Denisovans. Sexual compatibility doesn't seem to be a human problem.
Last edition:
Honesty and Authenticity. Resolutions.
Thursday, December 12, 2024
Lex Anteinternet: We’re in a very, very dangerous world right now.
Lex Anteinternet: We’re in a very, very dangerous world right now.:
We’re in a very, very dangerous world right now.
We’re in a very, very dangerous world right now, reminiscent of before world war two. Even the slogan is the same. ‘America First.’ That was what they said in the ’30s.
Mitch McConnell.
Wednesday, November 6, 2024
Lex Anteinternet: I wish it need not have happened in my time
Lex Anteinternet: I wish it need not have happened in my time:
I wish it need not have happened in my time
“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.
"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring
Sunday, November 3, 2024
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Lex Anteinternet: World Happiness Report 2025
Lex Anteinternet: World Happiness Report 2025 : World Happiness Report 2025 Read it and weep MAGA. Mexico is a happier country than the...
-
Lex Anteinternet: Hoarding bananas. : Hoarding bananas. This isn't really correct. Frankly, the other monkeys would take the hoarded ba... -
Lex Anteinternet: How not to be helpful. : How not to be helpful. I hesitate to post this, and probably shouldn't. I'm not a couns...
-
The Agrarian's Lament: Blog Update. New Feature. : Blog Update. New Feature. We have added a "pages" feature to this blog....
